APARTHIED? Discrimination? 2nd Class Citizenship???

种族歧视的购屋政策规定—--柔佛州最严重!!!APARTHIED???


希山和纳吉是罪魁祸首：柏特拉专访（三）

特约评论 7月3日 傍晚7点06分

文：纪传财（资深媒体工作者）纪传财新书《透视308：马来西亚醒觉了…》内，拉惹柏特拉的专访内容第三部分。

全文将分四期连载。(PLS REFER TO WWW.MALAYSIAKINI.COM), 在该文中提到:"马来人获得5%至7%的购买房屋优惠。其实，这并不符合宪法，但发展商接受了。这不是法律。好，就说安邦市议会设立了特别条例来批准房屋发展的例子。上面写着你的房屋发展计划必须有多少廉价屋，多少单位保留给土著，多少折扣等等。究竟谁是该议会的成员？


巫统、马华、国大党。马华和国大党在做什么？为什么没有人前来挑战它？去法庭上拼出胜负？为什么不是发展商呢？因为他们都是华人啦。华人接受了它。为什么接受？你看，很多人指出新经济政策的这个、那个，最后呢，华人却接受了。为什么接受了还要吵？


其实，新经济政策并不是宪法，但没有人去挑战它。第153条款—马来人的权利和特权，但它从来没有被清楚地阐述!


XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX


谈到买屋子的折扣,先看看:行动党八打灵再也北区国会议员潘俭伟说:如果在马来西亚没有人会是二等公民，哪为什么一个种族社体还是可以根据法律在购买千百万的高尚别墅获得7% 的折扣???

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX


我的看法:不讲你不知道:种族歧视的购屋政策规定—柔佛州最严重柔佛州的人民,尤其是华人对土著有15%的优惠待遇,而其他种族要付出最高的代价购屋感到异常愤怒,但是在霸权主义下,无法出声!潘俭伟先生说7%是在其他州,但是柔佛州人被欺压那么多年,实在是太过分了!


很多华人买一间房子,要用一生的积蓄,还要多付出15%,你说那有这种道理?恶法一定要揭露!柔佛恶霸滥权排第一,一定要改变!柔佛州人,还有反对这恶法的所有马来西亚人,一定要在下届大选用选票教训柔佛州的国阵—比恶霸更令人发指的种族藐视!


拉惹柏特拉的专访内容谈到上述的购买屋子的不公平事件!那是APARTHIED???--Dasar pemisahan kaum berdasarkan warna kulit yang pernah diamalkan di Afrika Selatan(LONGMAN Kamus Dwibahasa, Pearson Malaysia Sdn Bhd 2008)!!!


If this is not Aparthied, then what shall we call this partial and not just rules implemented by BN, even though this is not official ACT at all!



PLEASE READ BELOW-MENTIONED ARTICLE---mentioned about the abuse of this rule!!!BARISAN NASIONAL & SETANUMNO IS ABUSING THIS RULE!!!!!!!!!!

The Quote Is Here:

".......2. The special position of the Malays as prescribed under Article 153 of the Constitution is limited in scope to only the reservation of reasonable quotas in these 3 sectors: public services, educational places and business licenses. Hence, the present rampant racial discriminations practiced on almost every facet of our national life are mostly violations of the Constitution. Examples of these violations are:


a) Racial discrimination in the appointment and promotion of employees in publicly funded bodies, resulting in these becoming almost mono-raced bodies (particular so in their top strata). These bodies include: the civil service, police, army and various semi and quasi government agencies.

b) Barring of non-Malays from tenders and contracts controlled directly or indirectly by the government.


c) Imposition of compulsory price discounts and quotas in favour of Malays in housing projects.



d) Imposition of compulsory share quota for Malays in non-Malay companies.

e) Blanket barring of non-Malays to publicly funded academic institutions (that should include the Uitm, which is the subject of debate in Parliament referred to earlier in this article).

f) Completely lop-sided allocation of scholarships and seats of learning in clearly unreasonable proportions that reflect racial discriminations.